Renewed Class Action Motion Filed in Volvo Sunroof Case

question manVolvo vehicle owners have served a renewed motion for class certification on the automaker. The owners allege Volvo’s sunroofs harbor a defect, allowing water to flood the vehicles. The five-year class action suit was recently given new life after the U.S. District Court of New Jersey judge opened the door for the renewed motion.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals had vacated a previous class certification last year and remanded the case back to the lower court.

“Plaintiffs have served their renewed motion for class certification and all accompanying papers upon counsel for defendants,” according to court documents.

The judge had asked that the motion be served but not filed.

Given the new motion, Volvo seeks access to additional discovery.

“For example, some of the named plaintiffs who are proposed as class representatives have driven their vehicles for nearly five years since they were deposed,” according to court documents. “If they have not experienced any further instance of a clogged sunroof drain, that evidence would be extremely probative of the purported common defect.”

In their response, plaintiffs’ attorneys say, “The motion is a thinly veiled effort to further delay these proceedings, harass these former class representatives and third parties, seek an end-run around the court’s Daubert rulings, and is entirely without merit.”

The six states the District Court judge had originally granted as subclasses for class action were Massachusetts, Florida, Hawaii, New Jersey, California and Maryland.

The plaintiffs contend the alleged “defect” sunroofs are on Volvo’s S40, S60, S80, V50 (model years 2004 to present), XC90 (model years 2003 to present) and V50 (model years 2005 to present).

The suit was filed in 2010 in U.S. District Court by Joanne Neale of Needham, Mass., and seven other owners.

The judge had not issued any new decisions at press time.

To read Volvo’s motion for further discovery, click here.

To read the plaintiffs’ opposition, click here.

This article is from glassBYTEs™, the free e-newsletter that covers the latest auto glass industry news. Click HERE to sign up—there is no charge. Interested in a deeper dive? Free subscriptions to Auto Glass Repair and Replacement (AGRR) magazine in print or digital format are available. Subscribe at no charge HERE.

This entry was posted in glassBYTEs Original Story and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Renewed Class Action Motion Filed in Volvo Sunroof Case

  1. Tracey says:

    My 2009 Volvo C30 has the same problem. Will I be covered?



  2. MissB says:

    I have the same problem with my
    Volvo s40 2006. The flooding is a nightmare.

  3. Donald J. Dorsey Jr. says:

    I just purchase 2005 S40. Wet, smelly drivers side floors. $750 to fix!! I want to join lawsuit!

  4. Anna Montemayor says:

    Having major issues right now with the 2010 Vovlo S40 . I also want in.

  5. Diane Lloyd says:

    This is rediculous that nothing is being done to settle this lawsuit. I have a 2004, S40 Volvo that has leaked and now the entire ceiling lining has come loose and hanging. I have had do remove the sunroof lining completely. This car only has 94,000.00 miles and should last a long time, however I have no idea what damage the interior has due to the water that has leaked into the car. Very Angry in Kentucky! We need to facebook this and bring attention to the dealer who sold us these vehicles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *